HPHR Paper™ · No. 26 · HPHR-P-026

Can Expectations Change Pain?

How Expectations Shape the Experience of Pain

Author
Dr Emmanuel Frantzis, DC, MSc, IFMCP, DACNB, DO (MP)
Level
Beginner
Topic
Pain Neuroscience

Author

Dr Emmanuel Frantzis

Founder, High Performance Health Restoration™

Executive Summary

Expectations influence many aspects of human physiology, including how pain is experienced. Contemporary neuroscience demonstrates that the nervous system integrates expectations with sensory information before conscious perception emerges. Rather than suggesting pain is imagined, this research shows that expectations represent one of many biological factors contributing to nervous system processing. Appreciating this relationship helps explain why identical physical situations may be experienced differently by different individuals.

Clinical Question

Can what we expect actually influence what we experience? Everyday life provides numerous examples suggesting that it can. Walking toward a familiar staircase and expecting one more step than is actually there, reaching to lift a box you believe is heavy only to discover it is empty, or stepping onto what appears to be solid ground only to find an unexpected surface all illustrate the brain's reliance on prediction. In each case, the nervous system generates expectations before sensory information has been fully processed. Pain appears to function in a remarkably similar way. Rather than processing sensory information in isolation, the nervous system continually integrates expectations, previous experiences, context, and incoming sensory information before generating conscious experience.

Scientific Foundation

Expectations arise from internal predictive models continuously generated by the nervous system. These models are shaped by prior experience, learning, environmental context, and physiological state.¹ When incoming sensory information aligns with expectations, perception tends to proceed efficiently. When substantial prediction errors occur, the nervous system updates its internal models accordingly.² Pain is no exception. Experimental studies demonstrate that expectations can influence pain perception through descending modulatory systems involving cortical, brainstem, and spinal mechanisms.³ These findings support the concept that expectations participate in nervous system processing without implying that pain lacks a biological foundation.

Landmark Concepts

Büchel et al. (2014)³ demonstrated that expectations substantially influence pain perception through identifiable neural mechanisms using a predictive coding framework. Their work showed that the brain continuously integrates prior expectations with incoming sensory information when constructing the experience of pain. Atlas and Wager (2012)⁴ further demonstrated that placebo and nocebo effects are associated with measurable changes in activity within the insula, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, and prefrontal cortex, providing strong evidence that expectations exert biological effects through distributed neural networks rather than simple psychological suggestion. ScienceDirect Together, these studies provide an important neuroscientific foundation for understanding how expectations influence pain perception.

Current Evidence

Atlas (2023) reviewed converging evidence demonstrating that verbal instructions, learning, and expectations influence subjective pain through parallel neural circuits involving both pain-related regions and broader networks responsible for affect, learning, and cognitive control. The review emphasizes that expectations shape pain through identifiable neurobiological mechanisms rather than through imagination or suggestion alone. Annual Reviews Building on earlier work in predictive processing, contemporary evidence supports the concept that expectations interact continuously with sensory input, attention, prior learning, and contextual information before conscious pain perception emerges. This growing body of research provides a biological framework for understanding placebo and nocebo effects while reinforcing that pain remains a genuine physiological experience influenced by multiple interacting sources of information. Annual Reviews

Discussion

Understanding the influence of expectations does not diminish the reality of pain. Rather, it expands our understanding of the biological processes contributing to perception. Expectations represent one source of information among many that the nervous system continually integrates while determining the most adaptive response. This perspective helps explain why identical injuries or medical procedures may be experienced differently by different individuals while remaining entirely consistent with modern neuroscience. Importantly, this understanding does not suggest that expectations alone determine pain. Pain emerges through the integration of sensory information with previous experiences, physiological state, emotional context, environmental factors, and cognitive processes. Expectations therefore represent one important component of a much larger adaptive system.

HPHR Clinical Perspective™

At HPHR, recognizing the role of expectations reinforces the importance of understanding the whole person rather than focusing solely on structural findings. Previous experiences, education, beliefs, physiological state, movement, sleep, stress, and environmental context all contribute to the information influencing nervous system function. Appreciating these relationships helps guide comprehensive assessment while supporting individualized strategies for restoration, resilience, and long-term performance. Rather than attempting to change expectations in isolation, the HPHR approach seeks to improve the overall biological environment influencing nervous system function so that healthier adaptive responses become possible.

Key Takeaway

The nervous system responds not only to what it experiences, but also to what it expects. Understanding expectations provides another important piece of the puzzle in explaining how pain emerges through the continuous integration of information within the nervous system.

Primary References

1. Clark A (2013). Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2. Friston K (2010). The Free-Energy Principle: A Unified Brain Theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 3. Büchel C, Geuter S, Sprenger C, Eippert F (2014). Placebo analgesia: A predictive coding perspective. Neuron. 4. Atlas LY, Wager TD (2012). How expectations shape pain. Neuroscience Letters. ScienceDirect 5. Atlas LY (2023). How Instructions, Learning, and Expectations Shape Pain and Neurobiological Responses. Annual Review of Neuroscience. Annual Reviews

Your pathway

Continue Learning

HPHR is a structured learning environment. Each step below carries the same subject a little further — from the filmed episode, through the written papers, into the wider topic, and finally into practice.

  1. Companion Academy Lesson

    Coming Soon

    The Academy Master Lesson for this paper is in production.

  2. Previous Paper

    Why Does the Brain Predict Pain?

    Where this line of reasoning began.

  3. Next Paper

    Why Did Pain Neuroscience Need a New Theory?

    The next step in the sequence.

  4. Related Topic

    Pain Neuroscience

    Every episode and paper in this cluster.

  5. Future Book

    The Adaptive Brain™

    Coming Soon

  6. Apply for Membership

    Have this science applied to your own physiology.

    Clinician-guided restoration, built around your findings.

    Apply

Newsletter

Receive practical neuroscience and health restoration insights.

Membership

Restoration guided by this science.

Explore Membership