HPHR Paper™ · No. 13
- Author
- Dr Emmanuel Frantzis, Founder, High Performance Health Restoration
- Published
- Published September 2026
- Reading time
- 4 min read
- Level
- Intermediate
Clinical Question
Every moment of every day, the nervous system receives a continuous stream of information regarding the body's internal physiological condition. Heart rate, respiration, blood pressure, temperature, hunger, thirst, immune activity, and visceral sensation are monitored without conscious effort. Collectively, these signals contribute to the body's internal physiological awareness, a process known as interoception.
Far from operating independently, pain is interpreted within this continuously updated internal landscape. Appreciating the relationship between interoception and pain provides an important framework for understanding why persistent pain reflects integrated nervous system function rather than isolated nociceptive signalling.
Scientific Foundation
The Insula and Interoception
The principal cortical structure responsible for integrating interoceptive information is the insula.
The insular cortex receives afferent information originating from throughout the body, including cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, autonomic, endocrine, and nociceptive systems. Rather than processing these signals independently, the insula integrates them into a unified representation of the body's internal physiological condition.
Through extensive reciprocal connections with the anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, thalamus, and other components of the salience network, the insula contributes not only to bodily awareness but also to emotional processing, behavioural adaptation, autonomic regulation, and pain perception.
Consequently, pain should not be viewed as an isolated sensory event. It emerges within the broader physiological context continuously monitored by the adaptive nervous system.
Landmark Concepts
Landmark Studies
One of the landmark contributions to contemporary neuroscience was provided by Craig (2003; 2009)¹˒², who proposed that the insular cortex serves as the primary cortical centre for interoception.
Craig described how ascending physiological information from throughout the body converges within the insular cortex to generate conscious awareness of the body's internal state. His work demonstrated that interoception extends well beyond visceral sensation, encompassing autonomic regulation, temperature, respiration, cardiovascular function, immune activity, affective experience, and pain.
Importantly, Craig emphasized that the insula does not process pain as an isolated sensation. Rather, it integrates nociceptive information with ongoing physiological and emotional signals to generate a unified representation of the body's condition. This work fundamentally changed our understanding of pain by positioning it within the broader context of whole-body physiology.
Current Evidence
Current Evidence Update
Contemporary research continues to strengthen the role of the insula as a central hub for interoception and integrated pain processing.
Khalsa and colleagues (2024)³ published updated recommendations on the scientific study of interoception, emphasizing its role in integrating physiological signals across cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, immune, endocrine, and autonomic systems. Their work reinforces interoception as a fundamental organizational principle of nervous system function rather than a process limited to bodily awareness.
Similarly, McBenedict and colleagues (2024)⁴ reviewed structural and functional alterations of the insular cortex across multiple chronic pain conditions. Their analysis concluded that the insula contributes to interoception, salience detection, autonomic regulation, emotional processing, and pain perception, further supporting its central role within distributed pain networks.
Collectively, these contemporary investigations reinforce the concept that persistent pain is interpreted within the broader physiological condition of the individual, highlighting the importance of integrated clinical assessment rather than symptom-based evaluation alone.
Discussion
One of the defining themes of contemporary pain neuroscience is that pain cannot be separated from the physiological state of the individual experiencing it.
Because the insula continuously integrates information related to respiration, cardiovascular activity, autonomic regulation, metabolism, emotional state, and nociception, alterations in any of these systems have the potential to influence how pain is experienced. This perspective helps explain why persistent pain frequently coexists with changes in sleep, stress physiology, fatigue, mood, cognitive function, and overall wellbeing.
Recognizing the central role of interoception broadens clinical reasoning. Rather than focusing exclusively on the painful tissue, clinicians are encouraged to consider the wider physiological systems that continuously influence the nervous system's interpretation of pain. This integrated perspective is fundamental to understanding persistent pain and reflects one of the central principles underlying High Performance Health Restoration™.
HPHR Clinical Perspective™
If the insula continually integrates information from respiration, cardiovascular function, autonomic activity, emotion, and pain, should persistent pain be viewed as an isolated symptom—or as one component of the nervous system's ongoing interpretation of the body's internal physiological state?
Primary References
1. Craig, A. D. (2003). Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(4), 500–505.
2. Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70.
3. Khalsa, S. S., et al. (2024). Interoception and mental health: Contemporary perspectives and recommendations. Biological Psychiatry.
4. McBenedict, B., Petrus, D., Pires, M. P., et al. (2024). The role of the insula in chronic pain and associated structural changes: An integrative review. Cureus, 16(4), e58511.