HPHR Paper™ · No. 17
- Author
- Dr Emmanuel Frantzis, Founder, High Performance Health Restoration
- Published
- Published September 2026
- Reading time
- 4 min read
- Level
- Intermediate
Executive Summary
Inflammation has traditionally been viewed as a localized response to tissue injury. Contemporary neuroscience, however, has demonstrated that inflammatory activity extends far beyond injured tissues and participates in continuous communication with the nervous system. Through complex interactions involving immune mediators, glial cells, cytokines, and neural pathways, inflammation has the potential to influence nociceptive processing, neuroplasticity, and adaptive nervous system function. This paper examines the relationship between inflammation and the nervous system, reviews landmark developments in neuroimmune communication, and discusses why understanding persistent pain requires consideration of the broader physiological environment in which the nervous system operates.
Clinical Question
Inflammation is one of the body's fundamental biological responses to injury, infection, and tissue stress. Under normal circumstances, inflammatory processes support healing by coordinating immune activity, tissue repair, and restoration of physiological homeostasis.
For many years, inflammation was viewed primarily as a localized event occurring within injured tissues. Contemporary neuroscience has significantly expanded this understanding. It is now recognized that inflammatory mediators communicate continuously with the nervous system, influencing neuronal function, pain processing, neuroplasticity, and behavioural adaptation.
This broader perspective changes the way persistent pain is investigated. Rather than asking only whether inflammation is present within a painful tissue, clinicians are increasingly encouraged to consider how inflammatory physiology may influence the adaptive state of the nervous system itself.
Scientific Foundation
Neuroimmune Communication
The nervous and immune systems function through continuous bidirectional communication. Cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, immune cells, and glial cells participate in an ongoing exchange of information that allows the nervous system to monitor changes occurring throughout the body.¹⁻³
Within the central nervous system, microglia and astrocytes play particularly important roles in regulating neuronal function. These glial cells actively monitor the neural environment and respond to changes in physiological state by releasing signalling molecules capable of influencing synaptic transmission, neuronal excitability, and adaptive plasticity.¹˒²
Inflammatory signalling therefore should not be viewed solely as a marker of tissue injury. It represents part of the information continually received, interpreted, and integrated by the adaptive nervous system.
Landmark Concepts
The contemporary understanding of neuroimmune communication emerged through the convergence of several important areas of investigation. Watkins and Maier (2005)¹ helped establish that immune signalling molecules influence central nervous system function through complex bidirectional communication between the immune and nervous systems, fundamentally changing the way researchers viewed interactions between inflammation and pain. Building upon these concepts, Milligan and Watkins (2009)² demonstrated that glial cells are active participants in pain modulation rather than passive supporting structures, emphasizing their role in regulating neuronal excitability through neuroimmune signalling. More recently, Grace and colleagues (2021)³ expanded this framework by describing persistent pain as the product of dynamic interactions among neurons, glial cells, immune mediators, and adaptive nervous system processes. Together, these landmark investigations demonstrate that inflammation influences far more than injured tissues. It contributes to the physiological environment within which the nervous system continually adapts and responds.
Current Evidence
Contemporary neuroimmune research continues to expand our understanding of the intimate relationship between inflammation and adaptive nervous system function.
Ji and colleagues (2023)⁴ reviewed emerging evidence demonstrating that interactions among immune mediators, glial cells, neurons, and peripheral tissues contribute to adaptive changes associated with persistent pain. Their work emphasizes that neuroimmune communication represents a dynamic regulatory process rather than a simple inflammatory response.
Similarly, Cordeiro and colleagues (2024)⁵ highlighted the relationship between brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neuroimmune signalling, and neuroplasticity, demonstrating that inflammatory processes and adaptive nervous system function are closely interconnected. Their review reinforces the concept that persistent pain develops within a broader biological framework involving immune regulation, synaptic plasticity, and ongoing nervous system adaptation.
Collectively, these contemporary investigations strengthen the understanding that inflammation influences much more than pain. It contributes to the physiological environment continually interpreted by the adaptive nervous system.
Discussion
One of the recurring themes throughout contemporary neuroscience is that the nervous system does not function independently of the rest of the body. Rather, it continuously receives and responds to information originating from multiple physiological systems, including the immune system. Inflammatory mediators therefore represent more than localized markers of tissue injury. They become part of the ongoing biological information influencing nervous system function.
This perspective broadens clinical reasoning. It does not suggest that inflammation explains every case of persistent pain, nor does it imply that all inflammation is pathological. Instead, it encourages clinicians to consider whether inflammatory physiology may be influencing the adaptive state of the nervous system alongside other important contributors such as sleep, metabolism, autonomic regulation, breathing, movement, and psychological stress.
Understanding persistent pain from this perspective shifts attention away from isolated symptoms and toward the broader physiological systems that shape nervous system behaviour. In doing so, it reinforces one of the central principles of High Performance Health Restoration™: the nervous system responds not only to injury, but also to the physiological environment in which it functions.
HPHR Clinical Perspective™
If inflammatory signals become part of the information continually interpreted by the nervous system, should persistent pain be investigated solely at the site of symptoms—or should clinicians also seek to understand the physiological environment shaping the nervous system's response?
Primary References
1. Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F. (2005). Immune regulation of central nervous system functions: From sickness responses to pathological pain. (Seminal review on neuroimmune communication.)
2. Milligan, E. D., & Watkins, L. R. (2009). Pathological and protective roles of glia in chronic pain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 23–36.
3. Grace, P. M., et al. (2021). Neuroimmunology of chronic pain: From rodents to humans. (Review article.)
4. Ji, R. R., et al. (2023). Neuroimmune interactions in chronic pain. (Contemporary review.)
5. Cordeiro, R., et al. (2024). The role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in chronic pain: Links to central sensitization and neuroinflammation. Biomolecules, 14(1), 71.